Abstract
Diffusion and autoregression (AR) have long been seen as different categories of generative models, with diffusion specialising in continuous fields and AR specialising in discrete tokens. Recent work seeks to combine the advantages of the two models, and each hybrid fixes its decoding schedule by design. In this paper, we ask whether the performance of decoding schedules of one model can be predicted before decoding at a fixed number of steps. We describe diffusion, AR, and models in between as paths on one corruption lattice, and define the cost of a schedule as the dependence its parallel steps discard. The cost shows that the fewest steps of a zero-cost schedule are set by the geometry of the data, in the same way for tokens and for continuous fields. In particular, for data that are Markov on a graph and dependent along its paths, the fewest steps equal the graph's treedepth, which is logarithmic in the length of a sequence and linear in the side length of a grid. With fewer steps than the treedepth, every schedule pays a positive cost, whose ranking we predict before decoding with a kernel of pairwise dependence estimated from pretrained weights. Across text generation, image generation, and video generation, we verify most of the predictions about the rankings of different schedules under different metrics and benchmarks. This work therefore provides a design principle for decoding for future AR models, diffusion models, and anything in between. Our code is available at https://github.com/TSUITUENYUE/The-Lattice-of-Transition-Laws.
Community
Can we decide which decoding schedule works best BEFORE decoding, for diffusion, AR or anything in between?
The answer is YES.
In this paper, we unify diffusion, AR and their hybrids on one corruption lattice, where every decoder is a path. A schedule's cost is the dependence its parallel steps discard (their total correlation), which equals its divergence from exact sampling.
We then prove that the fewest steps of a zero-cost schedule are set by the geometry of the data. For data Markov on a graph, they equal the graph's treedepth: logarithmic in sequence length, linear in the side length of a grid.
Below the treedepth, every schedule discards some dependence. A pairwise-dependence kernel estimated from pretrained weights ranks which schedules discard least, before decoding.
We verify most of our predictions on the rankings of decoding schedules across dLLM, image and video generation.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Limits of Confidence in Diffusion (2026)
- From Truncation to Commitment: Persistent Context in Uniform Discrete Diffusion (2026)
- Self-Repulsive Sampling for Diffusion Language Models (2026)
- Hierarchical Continuous Diffusion Language Models (2026)
- Distribution Matching Distillation for Continuous Diffusion Language Models (2026)
- Distilled Continuous Diffusion Language Models Can Write Code in Few Steps---or One (2026)
- IDRF: Inverse-Distilled Reward Fine-tuning of Masked Discrete Diffusion Models (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.11216 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper