A free, monthly-refreshed compliance matrix of all 4,893 Indic-language datasets on the Hub, showing that 65% declare no license — so teams can avoid licensing traps (and missing-tag repos) before they train on them

Dataset: 65% of 4,893 Indic-language datasets declare no license — full compliance matrix

I scanned every Indic-language dataset on the Hub (hindi, tamil, bengali, telugu, marathi, malayalam, kannada, urdu, +9 more) and published the full results.

Headline numbers (scan date: 2026-08-01)

  • 3,185 of 4,893 datasets (65.1%) declare no license tag
  • 46.1% of all downloads hit no-license repos — including ai4bharat/IndicCorpV2 (2,888 downloads) and cfilt/iitb-english-hindi (1,003 downloads)
  • 154 datasets are CC-BY-NC — a silent trap for commercial training (e.g. ai4bharat/IndicParaphrase, 4,611 downloads)
  • 139 datasets carry ambiguous tags (other, cc, unknown)

The data

Full matrix with risk buckets + guidance for every repo (CSV + Parquet, CC0):

:backhand_index_pointing_right: hardik90/indic-dataset-license-matrix

Also in that repo: a sample audit report with a deep-dive on 3 flagship corpora, plus an FAQ covering commercial use, CC-BY-NC, and how to verify any dataset’s license.

Why it matters

Under the EU AI Act GPAI documentation duties and standard enterprise procurement policies, a missing license tag effectively disqualifies a dataset from commercial pipelines — regardless of the author’s original intent.

If you train or ship on Indic data, filter the matrix by risk_bucket and build your watchlist before your next fine-tune.

Maintainers: I’d love to see your license tags + provenance notes — the matrix is refreshed monthly, and I’m happy to help draft the card text.

The matrix is factual, API-derived metadata released under CC0. Not legal advice — verify anything you rely on.

Useful matrix. When you review these datasets, is the larger problem missing license metadata or not knowing whether the publisher still supports the listed version? Would an expiring, publisher-signed version record materially improve the matrix?