Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
image
imagewidth (px)
1.15k
1.92k
question
stringlengths
59
191
answer
stringlengths
2
323
species
stringclasses
4 values
variant
stringclasses
4 values
mange_label
stringclasses
3 values
bcs_label
stringclasses
3 values
qc_method
stringclasses
3 values
qc_mae_raw
float64
0.14
12.7
qc_mae_norm
float64
0.15
11.7
qc_ssim
float64
0.79
1
What is the health assessment of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus regarding alopecia (mange) and body condition?
Mange: M0 (no visible alopecia); Body Condition: B0 (normal body condition).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
5.056
4.879
0.9012
Does the Odocoileus virginianus exhibit severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and/or a very poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the animal shows extensive alopecia across its body, indicative of severe mange (M3), and is severely emaciated with prominent ribs and spine, consistent with a very poor body condition (B3).
odocoileus virginianus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
6.859
6.789
0.8513
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
Yes, the animal displays extensive alopecia, particularly on its dorsum and flanks, consistent with mange (M0). It also appears to be in poor body condition (B2), with visible ribs and a thin frame.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
6.457
4.327
0.9087
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears healthy, not indicative of poor body condition (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
2.451
2.14
0.9362
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Odocoileus virginianus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its coat appears intact, and its body condition seems adequate, indicating no poor body condition (B0).
odocoileus virginianus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
3.677
3.662
0.9249
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
No, the animal's fur appears full with no visible alopecia, and its body condition seems healthy, not indicative of poor body condition (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
4.127
4.13
0.9125
Can the Urocyon cinereoargenteus's health be assessed for alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or body condition (B0) in this camera trap image?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not visible in this image, preventing assessment of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
2.926
1.672
0.972
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show obvious signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its fur appears intact and its body condition seems healthy.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_ssim
7.958
7.019
0.8518
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with moderate mange (M3)?
Yes, the animal displays noticeable patchy and sparse fur, particularly on its flanks and back, which is consistent with moderate alopecia (M3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
8.674
6.753
0.8513
Is there evidence of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0) in this Urocyon cinereoargenteus?
Yes, the animal displays significant alopecia and thickened skin indicative of severe mange (M2), and appears to be in poor body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
5.528
5.31
0.8765
Based on the provided image, what is the health assessment of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus regarding mange (M3) and body condition (B3)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits severe alopecia and extensive skin lesions consistent with advanced mange (M3). Additionally, the animal appears emaciated with visible ribs and spine, indicating poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
2.946
2.697
0.941
Does the gray fox exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange or poor body condition?
No, the gray fox shows no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
4.659
4.626
0.9205
Based on the image, what is the assessment of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus's health regarding alopecia (mange) and body condition?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
2.931
2.545
0.954
Based on the visible areas, what is the mange score (M0 for no mange) for this Urocyon cinereoargenteus?
Due to the limited view of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus (gray fox), primarily showing only the back of the head and ears, a comprehensive assessment for mange (M0) cannot be definitively made. The visible fur appears normal, but this is insufficient for a full classification.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
2.306
1.975
0.941
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit any signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus appears to have a full coat with no visible signs of alopecia or skin lesions consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears normal, with no indications of emaciation or poor health (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_ssim
7.472
7.449
0.882
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this camera trap image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
4.714
4.662
0.9054
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
M0: No visible alopecia consistent with mange. B0: Normal body condition.
odocoileus virginianus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
4.797
4.769
0.8786
Based on the camera trap image, what is the assessment of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and body condition (B2) for the Urocyon cinereoargenteus?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
5.816
3.916
0.9225
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit a body condition score of B2 (thin) based on the visibility of its ribs and backbone?
Yes, the prominent ribs and visible backbone indicate a thin body condition (B2).
odocoileus virginianus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.94
4.568
0.9046
What is the body condition score of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this image?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus appears to have a body condition score of B3, indicating a moderate body condition.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
3.091
2.49
0.9309
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of severe emaciation (B3) and alopecia consistent with mange (M3)?
Yes, the deer is severely emaciated (B3) with prominent ribs and spine, and shows extensive alopecia consistent with mange (M3).
odocoileus virginianus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
4.597
4.464
0.9034
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Odocoileus virginianus in the image shows no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0).
odocoileus virginianus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
3.882
3.788
0.9232
Does the Urocyon cinereoargargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or an abnormal body condition (B2)?
Based on the visible portion of the animal, there are no signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0), and its body condition appears normal (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
5.172
5.145
0.9029
Does the gray fox exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the gray fox shows moderate alopecia, particularly on its flanks and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M3). Its body condition appears to be B3 (thin).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
3.219
3.155
0.9344
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus displays severe alopecia, particularly on the head, neck, and flanks, consistent with mange (M3). Additionally, the animal appears emaciated with visible ribs, indicating poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
3.599
3.053
0.9224
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the animal does not show signs of alopecia (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its coat appears healthy and full, and its body condition seems appropriate for its species.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
4.146
4.056
0.9191
Does the Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of severe mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the Odocoileus virginianus exhibits severe alopecia and skin lesions consistent with mange (M3), and its prominent ribs and spine indicate poor body condition (B3).
odocoileus virginianus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_ssim
7.63
7.637
0.8702
Does the Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
Yes, the larger Odocoileus virginianus displays extensive alopecia and visible skin lesions consistent with mange (M2), and its body condition appears poor (B0) with prominent ribs.
odocoileus virginianus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_ssim
8.483
8.499
0.8541
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with moderate to severe mange (M3)?
Yes, the animal displays significant alopecia, particularly on the hindquarters and legs, which is consistent with moderate to severe mange (M3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
6.194
6.156
0.8875
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
Based on the visible features, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit obvious signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
2.966
2.223
0.9505
Does the gray fox exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the gray fox shows extensive alopecia across its body, indicative of severe mange (M3), and appears emaciated with visible ribs, consistent with poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
8.639
6.956
0.8634
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3)?
Yes, the animal shows noticeable patchy hair loss and a rough coat, particularly on its back and flanks, which is consistent with alopecia indicative of moderate mange (M3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
2.195
2.07
0.957
Is there evidence of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3) in the Urocyon cinereoargenteus shown in the image?
Due to the limited view of only the top of the animal's head and ears, it is not possible to assess for alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or to determine its body condition (B3) from this image.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
2.201
1.724
0.9509
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit a poor body condition (B2)?
Yes, the Odocoileus virginianus exhibits a poor body condition (B2), characterized by its emaciated state with clearly visible ribs and prominent hip bones.
odocoileus virginianus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
6.437
4.463
0.9269
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the animal displays patchy fur loss, particularly noticeable on its flanks and hindquarters, which is consistent with alopecia often observed in cases of mange.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
3.972
3.42
0.9194
Does the gray fox exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the gray fox exhibits significant alopecia, particularly on its face and ears, consistent with mange (M2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
5.155
5.13
0.8829
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of severe mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
Yes, the gray fox displays extensive alopecia and visible skin lesions, particularly on its head, ears, and flanks, which is consistent with severe mange (M2). Furthermore, the animal appears emaciated, indicating a poor body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
5.974
5.914
0.8832
Visually assess the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image for signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and its body condition (B2).
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibits no alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.153
3.147
0.9173
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibits significant alopecia consistent with mange (M2) and appears to be in poor body condition (B0), with visible ribs and emaciation.
odocoileus virginianus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
3.971
3.974
0.9163
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows no signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
5.943
5.894
0.8925
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the animal shows areas of sparse and patchy fur, particularly around the head and neck, which are consistent with moderate alopecia (M2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
2.584
2.265
0.9521
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange or appear to be in poor body condition?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
4.378
4.35
0.9222
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in healthy body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
5.791
5.61
0.9003
What is the body condition score of the Odocoileus virginianus in this image?
The Odocoileus virginianus in the image appears thin, with visible ribs and prominent hip bones, indicating a body condition score of B2.
odocoileus virginianus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
5.549
5.534
0.884
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or a body condition score of B2 (thin)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not show clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). However, its body condition appears to be B2 (thin), as evidenced by visible ribs and a lean frame.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
4.145
4.078
0.9196
Does the urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange or poor body condition?
No, the animal does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
2.779
2.421
0.9668
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the gray fox displays extensive alopecia across its body, especially on the trunk and limbs, which is consistent with severe mange (M3). Additionally, its prominent ribs and spine indicate a poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
4.894
4.641
0.9134
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
5.341
3.932
0.9201
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3)?
Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus displays extensive hair loss and patchy fur, particularly on its flanks and hindquarters, which is consistent with severe alopecia indicative of mange (M3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
2.906
2.57
0.926
Is the Urocyon cinereoargenteus clearly visible in this image to assess its health condition for signs of alopecia (M2) or body condition (B0)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not clearly visible in this image, making it impossible to assess its health condition for signs of alopecia (M2) or body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
0.314
0.318
0.9966
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0), and its body condition appears normal (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
4.616
4.191
0.9185
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
6.097
5.902
0.8848
Based on the image, does the odocoileus virginianus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or a poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the deer exhibits significant alopecia, particularly on its torso and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M3). Its body condition appears poor, indicating a B3 score, with visible skeletal prominence.
odocoileus virginianus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
6.757
5.867
0.8531
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the deer shows extensive alopecia and visible skin lesions on its neck, shoulders, and flanks, which is consistent with mange (M2).
odocoileus virginianus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
5.503
5.51
0.8905
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.456
2.89
0.9243
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the animal shows extensive alopecia across its body, particularly on the trunk and tail, with visible skin lesions and a very thin body condition where ribs and spine are prominent, consistent with severe mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
7.442
6.289
0.8788
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or abnormal body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
5.415
5.359
0.8945
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not visible in the image, so its health condition regarding alopecia or body condition cannot be assessed.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
3.949
3.747
0.9247
What is the body condition of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus?
B2
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
2.052
1.693
0.9527
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the animal displays extensive alopecia (M3) across its body, particularly on the flanks and legs, and appears to be in poor body condition (B3) with visible ribs and a gaunt appearance.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_ssim
7.569
7.529
0.8616
Based on the visible features of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus, are there signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or an emaciated body condition (B2)?
No, there are no clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). The body condition (B2) cannot be definitively assessed from this partial view, but the visible head does not strongly indicate emaciation.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
2.491
2.477
0.9502
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). The fur appears generally intact, and the body condition seems adequate given the image quality.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
2.827
2.359
0.9301
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears average (B2), with no obvious emaciation or obesity.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
7.796
6.533
0.8753
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, there are visible patches of fur loss on the flanks and hindquarters, which could be consistent with early to moderate mange (M2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
3.812
3.275
0.9143
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0); its fur appears full and healthy. The animal also does not exhibit signs of poor body condition (B2); it appears to be in good physical shape.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
6.595
6.525
0.8582
Based on the camera trap image, does this Urocyon cinereoargenteus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears average (B2), with no visible emaciation or obesity.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.213
3.167
0.9373
Does the urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the animal shows significant alopecia, crusting, and lesions around the snout and nose, consistent with mange (M2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
8.299
6.903
0.8617
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows patchy alopecia on its flank and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M2). Its body condition appears fair, not indicative of poor body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
2.259
2.118
0.9562
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
2.924
2.414
0.949
Based on the image, does this Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the animal does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its fur appears intact and its body condition appears healthy.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
3.36
3.211
0.9145
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Odocoileus virginianus does not show visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears normal, indicating B0.
odocoileus virginianus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
3.992
3.778
0.925
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image display signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the deer exhibits noticeable patchy hair loss on its body, particularly on the flank and hindquarters, which is consistent with alopecia that could be indicative of mange (M2).
odocoileus virginianus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
4.087
4.006
0.9152
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the gray fox exhibits areas of sparse and patchy fur, particularly on its flanks and hindquarters, which is consistent with alopecia indicative of moderate mange (M2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
4.719
4.66
0.9188
Does the Procyon lotor exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
No, the Procyon lotor does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0), and its body condition appears normal (B2).
procyon lotor
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.64
2.531
0.9401
Does the Procyon lotor in the image show any signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or abnormal body condition (B0)?
The Procyon lotor in the image does not show any visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears normal (B0).
procyon lotor
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
2.301
1.838
0.9631
Does the urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
No, the urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2). Its fur appears full, and its body condition seems healthy.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.912
3.465
0.9122
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows extensive alopecia, skin thickening, and crusting consistent with severe mange (M3), and appears emaciated with visible ribs and hip bones, indicating poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
6.178
5.895
0.8839
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of poor body condition (B3) and severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3)?
Yes, the deer displays prominent ribs and hip bones, indicating poor body condition (B3), and extensive patchy hair loss across its body, consistent with severe alopecia or mange (M3).
odocoileus virginianus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_ssim
7.721
7.731
0.867
Is it possible to assess the presence of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or the body condition (B0) of the odocoileus virginianus in this image?
No, the image quality is too poor to identify an animal or accurately assess its health condition, including alopecia or body condition.
odocoileus virginianus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
2.367
1.877
0.9745
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or a poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the Odocoileus virginianus displays severe alopecia, particularly on its back and flanks, consistent with mange (M3), and is emaciated with prominent ribs and spine, indicating a poor body condition (B3).
odocoileus virginianus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
7.131
5.962
0.8776
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and a poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the gray fox displays extensive alopecia across its body, particularly on the trunk and hindquarters, which is consistent with severe mange (M3). Additionally, its ribs and bony prominences are clearly visible, indicating a poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
3.277
3.504
0.9423
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with moderate mange (M2)?
Yes, the animal shows patchy fur loss on its back and flanks, which is consistent with alopecia often seen in cases of moderate mange (M2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
2.875
2.524
0.9416
Based on the provided camera trap image, what is the assessment of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and body condition (B2) for the Urocyon cinereoargenteus?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition is assessed as moderate (B2), with ribs slightly discernible but not indicative of emaciation.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.763
2.957
0.943
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of poor body condition (B2) or alopecia consistent with mange (M0)?
The Odocoileus virginianus in the image clearly shows signs of poor body condition (B2), characterized by visible ribs and prominent hip bones, indicating emaciation. Due to the image quality and lighting, there are no definitive signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) that can be identified.
odocoileus virginianus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
2.978
2.751
0.936
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, the animal shows significant alopecia and apparent skin irritation on its hindquarters and flanks, which is consistent with mange (M2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
4.055
2.883
0.9297
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the background exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the background exhibits significant alopecia, particularly on its back and flanks, which is consistent with mange (M2). Its body condition appears to be B0 (normal) despite the hair loss.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
5.581
5.524
0.8739
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)?
Yes, there are visible patches of alopecia and skin irritation on the flank and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M2).
odocoileus virginianus
mange_only
M2
B0
night_pass
4.693
5.31
0.8701
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and/or poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits severe alopecia across its body, consistent with mange (M3), and appears emaciated with prominent ribs and hip bones, indicating poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
7.713
6.306
0.8608
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
day_both
5.575
5.457
0.9003
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, based on the visible features in this camera trap image, there are no clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0). The fur appears intact, and the body shape seems within a healthy range for a wild individual.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
1.99
1.965
0.9623
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit a healthy body condition (B2) and an absence of alopecia consistent with mange (M0)?
Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibits a healthy body condition (B2) and an absence of alopecia consistent with mange (M0).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
2.781
2.804
0.9444
Based on this image, is there any visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or can the body condition (B0) of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus be determined?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not visible in this image, therefore, neither alopecia consistent with mange (M0) nor body condition (B0) can be assessed.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
2.85
2.172
0.9535
What is the body condition score of the Odocoileus virginianus in the image, specifically noting if it is emaciated (B2)?
The Odocoileus virginianus appears emaciated, with ribs and hip bones prominently visible, consistent with a body condition score of B2.
odocoileus virginianus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_ssim
7.315
7.259
0.8816
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show obvious signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its coat appears relatively full, and its body condition seems healthy.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
4.076
3.991
0.919
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2). Its fur appears full and healthy, and its body condition seems adequate.
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
night_pass
3.202
3.149
0.9346
Does the procyon lotor in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)?
Based on the visible features, the procyon lotor does not show clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to have a normal body condition (B0).
procyon lotor
sham
M0
B0
night_pass
2.334
2.301
0.9535
Does this Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the gray fox displays significant patchy hair loss across its body and face, consistent with alopecia indicative of mange (M3). Its body condition appears thin, suggesting it may also be in poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
night_pass
4.731
2.873
0.94
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)?
No, the Odocoileus virginianus in the image does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0).
odocoileus virginianus
mange_only
M2
B0
day_both
4.746
4.645
0.8783
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)?
The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B2).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
emaciated_only
M0
B2
day_both
7.443
6.619
0.8821
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of severe mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)?
Yes, the animal displays extensive alopecia and skin lesions consistent with severe mange (M3), and its emaciated appearance indicates poor body condition (B3).
urocyon cinereoargenteus
severe_both
M3
B3
day_both
8.573
6.928
0.8514
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Synthetic Wildlife Health: Camera Trap Imagery for Alopecia and Body Condition Screening

Dataset Summary

This dataset contains 553 synthetic camera trap images depicting alopecia (hair loss consistent with mange) and body condition deterioration in North American wildlife, along with paired visual question-answering annotations for health assessment tasks.

All images are AI-generated edits of real camera trap photographs sourced from iWildCam 2022. The generative pipeline applies controlled phenotype edits to the animal region while preserving the original background, lighting conditions, and camera-trap artifacts. Every image in this dataset passed scene-drift quality control, verifying that the background was not altered by the generative model.

This dataset is released alongside the paper:

Generating Synthetic Wildlife Health Data from Camera Trap Imagery: A Pipeline for Alopecia and Body Condition Training Data
David Brundage PhD, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine


Intended Use

This dataset is intended as a screening data source, not a diagnostic tool. Images are labeled as "hair loss consistent with mange" rather than clinically diagnosed mange. Visual assessment from camera trap imagery cannot distinguish mange from lice, seasonal shedding, mechanical hair loss, or idiopathic follicular inactivity. The intended model output from a classifier trained on this data is a suspect flag for expert review.

Appropriate uses include:

  • Training wildlife health screening classifiers
  • Sim-to-real transfer experiments for camera trap health monitoring
  • Benchmarking synthetic data generation pipelines for ecological applications

Dataset Structure

Data Fields

Field Type Description
image Image Camera trap photograph with synthetic phenotype edit applied
question string Health assessment question about the animal
answer string Structured health assessment answer
species string Latin species name
variant string Phenotype variant: sham, mange_only, emaciated_only, severe_both
mange_label string Alopecia severity: M0 (healthy), M2 (moderate), M3 (severe)
bcs_label string Body condition score: B0 (healthy), B2 (moderate wasting), B3 (severe emaciation)
qc_method string QC path: day_pass, night_pass
qc_mae_raw float Raw mean absolute error (background pixels)
qc_mae_norm float Color-normalized MAE (per-channel DC offset corrected)
qc_ssim float Structural similarity index (SSIM) of background region

Phenotype Variants

Variant Mange Label BCS Label Description
sham M0 B0 Healthy negative control
mange_only M2 B0 Moderate patchy hair loss with scaling and crusting
emaciated_only M0 B2 Visible ribs, noticeable muscle wasting
severe_both M3 B3 Severe extensive hair loss + pronounced skeletal landmarks

Species

Species Common Name
Urocyon cinereoargenteus Gray fox
Canis lupus Gray wolf
Odocoileus virginianus White-tailed deer
Procyon lotor Raccoon

Data Splits

Split Size
Train ~497 images (90%)
Test ~56 images (10%)

Generation Pipeline

Base Image Curation

Base images were drawn from iWildCam 2022 using MegaDetector v4 for animal bounding box detection. Sampling prioritized center-frame animal placement (weight 0.6 center, 0.3 mid-frame, 0.1 edge/corner) and maintained stratified balance across species, season, and day/night conditions.

Phenotype Editing

Synthetic variants were generated using Gemini 3.1 Flash Image. Each edit prompt supplied the model with MegaDetector bounding box coordinates, species identity, severity descriptors, and explicit instructions to edit only the animal region while preserving the background pixel-identical. Lesion placement followed species-specific biology: for canids, sarcoptic mange progression (periocular → ear margins → elbows → flanks); for hoofstock, distribution excludes dorsal midline regions inaccessible to self-grooming.

Quality Control

Every image in this dataset passed scene-drift QC using a decoupled mask-then-score approach:

  1. Sham pre-filter: The M0/B0 sham variant is generated first; base images where the sham fails QC are excluded entirely (~16% of bases filtered this way).
  2. Mask construction: Pixel-difference thresholding + connected component labeling identifies changed regions, constrained to overlap the MegaDetector bounding box. Images where the change mask exceeds 70% of frame area are rejected as global re-renders.
  3. Scene scoring: Computed on Gaussian-blurred background pixels (outside the animal mask):
    • Daytime: OR-gate passes if normalized MAE ≤ 7.0 or SSIM ≥ 0.85
    • Nighttime/IR: raw MAE ≤ 5.0

Overall QC pass rate: 83% (553 of 666 generated variants). Images failing QC are not included in this release.


Pipeline Statistics

Metric Value
Species represented 4
Base images processed 201
Total variants generated 666
QC-passing variants (this dataset) 553 (83%)
Sham pre-filter rejection rate 16%
Daytime pass rate 85%
Nighttime pass rate 81%

Sim-to-Real Transfer Results

A classifier trained exclusively on this synthetic dataset and evaluated on real camera trap images of suspected health conditions achieved:

Model AUROC Balanced Accuracy
MLP (256 hidden units) + DINOv2 ViT-B/14 0.854 0.811
Linear probe + DINOv2 ViT-B/14 0.734 —

The real test set (N=70) consisted of 45 healthy iWildCam images held out from the base image pool and 25 community-reported suspected health condition images, controlling for species identity between classes. Suspect labels are community-reported, not clinically confirmed.


Limitations

  • Diagnostic ambiguity: Camera trap imagery cannot distinguish mange from lice, seasonal shedding, or idiopathic hair loss.
  • Species-condition mismatch: Confirmed mange in white-tailed deer is rare in some regions; the model may flag shedding or mechanical hair loss, requiring per-region calibration.
  • Posture confounds: Edits are applied to healthy-posture base images and cannot capture illness-related postural changes.
  • Transfer evaluation scale: The real evaluation set is small (N=70); the 0.85 AUROC reflects feasibility, not production-ready performance.

Citation

If you use this dataset, please cite:

@inproceedings{brundage2026synthetic,
  title     = {Generating Synthetic Wildlife Health Data from Camera Trap Imagery: A Pipeline for Alopecia and Body Condition Training Data},
  author    = {Brundage, David},
}

License

This dataset is released under CC BY 4.0. Base images are derived from iWildCam 2022; please also consult the iWildCam dataset license when using this data.


Contact

David Brundage PhD
University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine
brundage2@wisc.edu

Downloads last month
53