image imagewidth (px) 1.15k 1.92k | question stringlengths 59 191 | answer stringlengths 2 323 | species stringclasses 4
values | variant stringclasses 4
values | mange_label stringclasses 3
values | bcs_label stringclasses 3
values | qc_method stringclasses 3
values | qc_mae_raw float64 0.14 12.7 | qc_mae_norm float64 0.15 11.7 | qc_ssim float64 0.79 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
What is the health assessment of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus regarding alopecia (mange) and body condition? | Mange: M0 (no visible alopecia); Body Condition: B0 (normal body condition). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 5.056 | 4.879 | 0.9012 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus exhibit severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and/or a very poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the animal shows extensive alopecia across its body, indicative of severe mange (M3), and is severely emaciated with prominent ribs and spine, consistent with a very poor body condition (B3). | odocoileus virginianus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 6.859 | 6.789 | 0.8513 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | Yes, the animal displays extensive alopecia, particularly on its dorsum and flanks, consistent with mange (M0). It also appears to be in poor body condition (B2), with visible ribs and a thin frame. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 6.457 | 4.327 | 0.9087 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears healthy, not indicative of poor body condition (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 2.451 | 2.14 | 0.9362 | |
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Odocoileus virginianus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its coat appears intact, and its body condition seems adequate, indicating no poor body condition (B0). | odocoileus virginianus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 3.677 | 3.662 | 0.9249 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | No, the animal's fur appears full with no visible alopecia, and its body condition seems healthy, not indicative of poor body condition (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 4.127 | 4.13 | 0.9125 | |
Can the Urocyon cinereoargenteus's health be assessed for alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or body condition (B0) in this camera trap image? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not visible in this image, preventing assessment of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 2.926 | 1.672 | 0.972 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show obvious signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its fur appears intact and its body condition seems healthy. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_ssim | 7.958 | 7.019 | 0.8518 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with moderate mange (M3)? | Yes, the animal displays noticeable patchy and sparse fur, particularly on its flanks and back, which is consistent with moderate alopecia (M3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 8.674 | 6.753 | 0.8513 | |
Is there evidence of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0) in this Urocyon cinereoargenteus? | Yes, the animal displays significant alopecia and thickened skin indicative of severe mange (M2), and appears to be in poor body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 5.528 | 5.31 | 0.8765 | |
Based on the provided image, what is the health assessment of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus regarding mange (M3) and body condition (B3)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits severe alopecia and extensive skin lesions consistent with advanced mange (M3). Additionally, the animal appears emaciated with visible ribs and spine, indicating poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 2.946 | 2.697 | 0.941 | |
Does the gray fox exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange or poor body condition? | No, the gray fox shows no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 4.659 | 4.626 | 0.9205 | |
Based on the image, what is the assessment of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus's health regarding alopecia (mange) and body condition? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 2.931 | 2.545 | 0.954 | |
Based on the visible areas, what is the mange score (M0 for no mange) for this Urocyon cinereoargenteus? | Due to the limited view of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus (gray fox), primarily showing only the back of the head and ears, a comprehensive assessment for mange (M0) cannot be definitively made. The visible fur appears normal, but this is insufficient for a full classification. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 2.306 | 1.975 | 0.941 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit any signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus appears to have a full coat with no visible signs of alopecia or skin lesions consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears normal, with no indications of emaciation or poor health (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_ssim | 7.472 | 7.449 | 0.882 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this camera trap image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 4.714 | 4.662 | 0.9054 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | M0: No visible alopecia consistent with mange. B0: Normal body condition. | odocoileus virginianus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 4.797 | 4.769 | 0.8786 | |
Based on the camera trap image, what is the assessment of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and body condition (B2) for the Urocyon cinereoargenteus? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 5.816 | 3.916 | 0.9225 | |
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit a body condition score of B2 (thin) based on the visibility of its ribs and backbone? | Yes, the prominent ribs and visible backbone indicate a thin body condition (B2). | odocoileus virginianus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.94 | 4.568 | 0.9046 | |
What is the body condition score of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this image? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus appears to have a body condition score of B3, indicating a moderate body condition. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 3.091 | 2.49 | 0.9309 | |
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of severe emaciation (B3) and alopecia consistent with mange (M3)? | Yes, the deer is severely emaciated (B3) with prominent ribs and spine, and shows extensive alopecia consistent with mange (M3). | odocoileus virginianus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 4.597 | 4.464 | 0.9034 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Odocoileus virginianus in the image shows no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0). | odocoileus virginianus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 3.882 | 3.788 | 0.9232 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or an abnormal body condition (B2)? | Based on the visible portion of the animal, there are no signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0), and its body condition appears normal (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 5.172 | 5.145 | 0.9029 | |
Does the gray fox exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the gray fox shows moderate alopecia, particularly on its flanks and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M3). Its body condition appears to be B3 (thin). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 3.219 | 3.155 | 0.9344 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus displays severe alopecia, particularly on the head, neck, and flanks, consistent with mange (M3). Additionally, the animal appears emaciated with visible ribs, indicating poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 3.599 | 3.053 | 0.9224 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the animal does not show signs of alopecia (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its coat appears healthy and full, and its body condition seems appropriate for its species. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 4.146 | 4.056 | 0.9191 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of severe mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the Odocoileus virginianus exhibits severe alopecia and skin lesions consistent with mange (M3), and its prominent ribs and spine indicate poor body condition (B3). | odocoileus virginianus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_ssim | 7.63 | 7.637 | 0.8702 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | Yes, the larger Odocoileus virginianus displays extensive alopecia and visible skin lesions consistent with mange (M2), and its body condition appears poor (B0) with prominent ribs. | odocoileus virginianus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_ssim | 8.483 | 8.499 | 0.8541 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with moderate to severe mange (M3)? | Yes, the animal displays significant alopecia, particularly on the hindquarters and legs, which is consistent with moderate to severe mange (M3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 6.194 | 6.156 | 0.8875 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | Based on the visible features, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit obvious signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 2.966 | 2.223 | 0.9505 | |
Does the gray fox exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the gray fox shows extensive alopecia across its body, indicative of severe mange (M3), and appears emaciated with visible ribs, consistent with poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 8.639 | 6.956 | 0.8634 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3)? | Yes, the animal shows noticeable patchy hair loss and a rough coat, particularly on its back and flanks, which is consistent with alopecia indicative of moderate mange (M3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 2.195 | 2.07 | 0.957 | |
Is there evidence of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3) in the Urocyon cinereoargenteus shown in the image? | Due to the limited view of only the top of the animal's head and ears, it is not possible to assess for alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or to determine its body condition (B3) from this image. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 2.201 | 1.724 | 0.9509 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit a poor body condition (B2)? | Yes, the Odocoileus virginianus exhibits a poor body condition (B2), characterized by its emaciated state with clearly visible ribs and prominent hip bones. | odocoileus virginianus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 6.437 | 4.463 | 0.9269 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the animal displays patchy fur loss, particularly noticeable on its flanks and hindquarters, which is consistent with alopecia often observed in cases of mange. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 3.972 | 3.42 | 0.9194 | |
Does the gray fox exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the gray fox exhibits significant alopecia, particularly on its face and ears, consistent with mange (M2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 5.155 | 5.13 | 0.8829 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of severe mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | Yes, the gray fox displays extensive alopecia and visible skin lesions, particularly on its head, ears, and flanks, which is consistent with severe mange (M2). Furthermore, the animal appears emaciated, indicating a poor body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 5.974 | 5.914 | 0.8832 | |
Visually assess the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image for signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and its body condition (B2). | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibits no alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.153 | 3.147 | 0.9173 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibits significant alopecia consistent with mange (M2) and appears to be in poor body condition (B0), with visible ribs and emaciation. | odocoileus virginianus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 3.971 | 3.974 | 0.9163 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows no signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 5.943 | 5.894 | 0.8925 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the animal shows areas of sparse and patchy fur, particularly around the head and neck, which are consistent with moderate alopecia (M2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 2.584 | 2.265 | 0.9521 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange or appear to be in poor body condition? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 4.378 | 4.35 | 0.9222 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in healthy body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 5.791 | 5.61 | 0.9003 | |
What is the body condition score of the Odocoileus virginianus in this image? | The Odocoileus virginianus in the image appears thin, with visible ribs and prominent hip bones, indicating a body condition score of B2. | odocoileus virginianus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 5.549 | 5.534 | 0.884 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or a body condition score of B2 (thin)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not show clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). However, its body condition appears to be B2 (thin), as evidenced by visible ribs and a lean frame. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 4.145 | 4.078 | 0.9196 | |
Does the urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange or poor body condition? | No, the animal does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 2.779 | 2.421 | 0.9668 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the gray fox displays extensive alopecia across its body, especially on the trunk and limbs, which is consistent with severe mange (M3). Additionally, its prominent ribs and spine indicate a poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 4.894 | 4.641 | 0.9134 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 5.341 | 3.932 | 0.9201 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3)? | Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus displays extensive hair loss and patchy fur, particularly on its flanks and hindquarters, which is consistent with severe alopecia indicative of mange (M3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 2.906 | 2.57 | 0.926 | |
Is the Urocyon cinereoargenteus clearly visible in this image to assess its health condition for signs of alopecia (M2) or body condition (B0)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not clearly visible in this image, making it impossible to assess its health condition for signs of alopecia (M2) or body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 0.314 | 0.318 | 0.9966 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0), and its body condition appears normal (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 4.616 | 4.191 | 0.9185 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 6.097 | 5.902 | 0.8848 | |
Based on the image, does the odocoileus virginianus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or a poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the deer exhibits significant alopecia, particularly on its torso and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M3). Its body condition appears poor, indicating a B3 score, with visible skeletal prominence. | odocoileus virginianus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 6.757 | 5.867 | 0.8531 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the deer shows extensive alopecia and visible skin lesions on its neck, shoulders, and flanks, which is consistent with mange (M2). | odocoileus virginianus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 5.503 | 5.51 | 0.8905 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.456 | 2.89 | 0.9243 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the animal shows extensive alopecia across its body, particularly on the trunk and tail, with visible skin lesions and a very thin body condition where ribs and spine are prominent, consistent with severe mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 7.442 | 6.289 | 0.8788 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or abnormal body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 5.415 | 5.359 | 0.8945 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in this image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not visible in the image, so its health condition regarding alopecia or body condition cannot be assessed. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 3.949 | 3.747 | 0.9247 | |
What is the body condition of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus? | B2 | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 2.052 | 1.693 | 0.9527 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the animal displays extensive alopecia (M3) across its body, particularly on the flanks and legs, and appears to be in poor body condition (B3) with visible ribs and a gaunt appearance. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_ssim | 7.569 | 7.529 | 0.8616 | |
Based on the visible features of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus, are there signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or an emaciated body condition (B2)? | No, there are no clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). The body condition (B2) cannot be definitively assessed from this partial view, but the visible head does not strongly indicate emaciation. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 2.491 | 2.477 | 0.9502 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). The fur appears generally intact, and the body condition seems adequate given the image quality. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 2.827 | 2.359 | 0.9301 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears average (B2), with no obvious emaciation or obesity. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 7.796 | 6.533 | 0.8753 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, there are visible patches of fur loss on the flanks and hindquarters, which could be consistent with early to moderate mange (M2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 3.812 | 3.275 | 0.9143 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0); its fur appears full and healthy. The animal also does not exhibit signs of poor body condition (B2); it appears to be in good physical shape. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 6.595 | 6.525 | 0.8582 | |
Based on the camera trap image, does this Urocyon cinereoargenteus show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears average (B2), with no visible emaciation or obesity. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.213 | 3.167 | 0.9373 | |
Does the urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the animal shows significant alopecia, crusting, and lesions around the snout and nose, consistent with mange (M2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 8.299 | 6.903 | 0.8617 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows patchy alopecia on its flank and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M2). Its body condition appears fair, not indicative of poor body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 2.259 | 2.118 | 0.9562 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 2.924 | 2.414 | 0.949 | |
Based on the image, does this Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the animal does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its fur appears intact and its body condition appears healthy. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 3.36 | 3.211 | 0.9145 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Odocoileus virginianus does not show visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears normal, indicating B0. | odocoileus virginianus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 3.992 | 3.778 | 0.925 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image display signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the deer exhibits noticeable patchy hair loss on its body, particularly on the flank and hindquarters, which is consistent with alopecia that could be indicative of mange (M2). | odocoileus virginianus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 4.087 | 4.006 | 0.9152 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the gray fox exhibits areas of sparse and patchy fur, particularly on its flanks and hindquarters, which is consistent with alopecia indicative of moderate mange (M2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 4.719 | 4.66 | 0.9188 | |
Does the Procyon lotor exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | No, the Procyon lotor does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0), and its body condition appears normal (B2). | procyon lotor | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.64 | 2.531 | 0.9401 | |
Does the Procyon lotor in the image show any signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or abnormal body condition (B0)? | The Procyon lotor in the image does not show any visible signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition appears normal (B0). | procyon lotor | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 2.301 | 1.838 | 0.9631 | |
Does the urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | No, the urocyon cinereoargenteus does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2). Its fur appears full, and its body condition seems healthy. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.912 | 3.465 | 0.9122 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus shows extensive alopecia, skin thickening, and crusting consistent with severe mange (M3), and appears emaciated with visible ribs and hip bones, indicating poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 6.178 | 5.895 | 0.8839 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of poor body condition (B3) and severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3)? | Yes, the deer displays prominent ribs and hip bones, indicating poor body condition (B3), and extensive patchy hair loss across its body, consistent with severe alopecia or mange (M3). | odocoileus virginianus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_ssim | 7.721 | 7.731 | 0.867 | |
Is it possible to assess the presence of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or the body condition (B0) of the odocoileus virginianus in this image? | No, the image quality is too poor to identify an animal or accurately assess its health condition, including alopecia or body condition. | odocoileus virginianus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 2.367 | 1.877 | 0.9745 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or a poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the Odocoileus virginianus displays severe alopecia, particularly on its back and flanks, consistent with mange (M3), and is emaciated with prominent ribs and spine, indicating a poor body condition (B3). | odocoileus virginianus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 7.131 | 5.962 | 0.8776 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and a poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the gray fox displays extensive alopecia across its body, particularly on the trunk and hindquarters, which is consistent with severe mange (M3). Additionally, its ribs and bony prominences are clearly visible, indicating a poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 3.277 | 3.504 | 0.9423 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with moderate mange (M2)? | Yes, the animal shows patchy fur loss on its back and flanks, which is consistent with alopecia often seen in cases of moderate mange (M2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 2.875 | 2.524 | 0.9416 | |
Based on the provided camera trap image, what is the assessment of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and body condition (B2) for the Urocyon cinereoargenteus? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0). Its body condition is assessed as moderate (B2), with ribs slightly discernible but not indicative of emaciation. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.763 | 2.957 | 0.943 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of poor body condition (B2) or alopecia consistent with mange (M0)? | The Odocoileus virginianus in the image clearly shows signs of poor body condition (B2), characterized by visible ribs and prominent hip bones, indicating emaciation. Due to the image quality and lighting, there are no definitive signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) that can be identified. | odocoileus virginianus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 2.978 | 2.751 | 0.936 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, the animal shows significant alopecia and apparent skin irritation on its hindquarters and flanks, which is consistent with mange (M2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 4.055 | 2.883 | 0.9297 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the background exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the background exhibits significant alopecia, particularly on its back and flanks, which is consistent with mange (M2). Its body condition appears to be B0 (normal) despite the hair loss. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 5.581 | 5.524 | 0.8739 | |
Does this Odocoileus virginianus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2)? | Yes, there are visible patches of alopecia and skin irritation on the flank and hindquarters, consistent with mange (M2). | odocoileus virginianus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | night_pass | 4.693 | 5.31 | 0.8701 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of severe alopecia consistent with mange (M3) and/or poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits severe alopecia across its body, consistent with mange (M3), and appears emaciated with prominent ribs and hip bones, indicating poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 7.713 | 6.306 | 0.8608 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in normal body condition (B0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | day_both | 5.575 | 5.457 | 0.9003 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, based on the visible features in this camera trap image, there are no clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0). The fur appears intact, and the body shape seems within a healthy range for a wild individual. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 1.99 | 1.965 | 0.9623 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit a healthy body condition (B2) and an absence of alopecia consistent with mange (M0)? | Yes, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibits a healthy body condition (B2) and an absence of alopecia consistent with mange (M0). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 2.781 | 2.804 | 0.9444 | |
Based on this image, is there any visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or can the body condition (B0) of the Urocyon cinereoargenteus be determined? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus is not visible in this image, therefore, neither alopecia consistent with mange (M0) nor body condition (B0) can be assessed. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 2.85 | 2.172 | 0.9535 | |
What is the body condition score of the Odocoileus virginianus in the image, specifically noting if it is emaciated (B2)? | The Odocoileus virginianus appears emaciated, with ribs and hip bones prominently visible, consistent with a body condition score of B2. | odocoileus virginianus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_ssim | 7.315 | 7.259 | 0.8816 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show obvious signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). Its coat appears relatively full, and its body condition seems healthy. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 4.076 | 3.991 | 0.919 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | No, the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image does not show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2). Its fur appears full and healthy, and its body condition seems adequate. | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | night_pass | 3.202 | 3.149 | 0.9346 | |
Does the procyon lotor in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B0)? | Based on the visible features, the procyon lotor does not show clear signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to have a normal body condition (B0). | procyon lotor | sham | M0 | B0 | night_pass | 2.334 | 2.301 | 0.9535 | |
Does this Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the gray fox displays significant patchy hair loss across its body and face, consistent with alopecia indicative of mange (M3). Its body condition appears thin, suggesting it may also be in poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | night_pass | 4.731 | 2.873 | 0.94 | |
Does the Odocoileus virginianus in the image exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0)? | No, the Odocoileus virginianus in the image does not exhibit signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M2) or poor body condition (B0). | odocoileus virginianus | mange_only | M2 | B0 | day_both | 4.746 | 4.645 | 0.8783 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of alopecia consistent with mange (M0) or poor body condition (B2)? | The Urocyon cinereoargenteus exhibits no visible alopecia consistent with mange (M0) and appears to be in good body condition (B2). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | emaciated_only | M0 | B2 | day_both | 7.443 | 6.619 | 0.8821 | |
Does the Urocyon cinereoargenteus in the image show signs of severe mange (M3) or poor body condition (B3)? | Yes, the animal displays extensive alopecia and skin lesions consistent with severe mange (M3), and its emaciated appearance indicates poor body condition (B3). | urocyon cinereoargenteus | severe_both | M3 | B3 | day_both | 8.573 | 6.928 | 0.8514 |
Synthetic Wildlife Health: Camera Trap Imagery for Alopecia and Body Condition Screening
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains 553 synthetic camera trap images depicting alopecia (hair loss consistent with mange) and body condition deterioration in North American wildlife, along with paired visual question-answering annotations for health assessment tasks.
All images are AI-generated edits of real camera trap photographs sourced from iWildCam 2022. The generative pipeline applies controlled phenotype edits to the animal region while preserving the original background, lighting conditions, and camera-trap artifacts. Every image in this dataset passed scene-drift quality control, verifying that the background was not altered by the generative model.
This dataset is released alongside the paper:
Generating Synthetic Wildlife Health Data from Camera Trap Imagery: A Pipeline for Alopecia and Body Condition Training Data
David Brundage PhD, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine
Intended Use
This dataset is intended as a screening data source, not a diagnostic tool. Images are labeled as "hair loss consistent with mange" rather than clinically diagnosed mange. Visual assessment from camera trap imagery cannot distinguish mange from lice, seasonal shedding, mechanical hair loss, or idiopathic follicular inactivity. The intended model output from a classifier trained on this data is a suspect flag for expert review.
Appropriate uses include:
- Training wildlife health screening classifiers
- Sim-to-real transfer experiments for camera trap health monitoring
- Benchmarking synthetic data generation pipelines for ecological applications
Dataset Structure
Data Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
image |
Image | Camera trap photograph with synthetic phenotype edit applied |
question |
string | Health assessment question about the animal |
answer |
string | Structured health assessment answer |
species |
string | Latin species name |
variant |
string | Phenotype variant: sham, mange_only, emaciated_only, severe_both |
mange_label |
string | Alopecia severity: M0 (healthy), M2 (moderate), M3 (severe) |
bcs_label |
string | Body condition score: B0 (healthy), B2 (moderate wasting), B3 (severe emaciation) |
qc_method |
string | QC path: day_pass, night_pass |
qc_mae_raw |
float | Raw mean absolute error (background pixels) |
qc_mae_norm |
float | Color-normalized MAE (per-channel DC offset corrected) |
qc_ssim |
float | Structural similarity index (SSIM) of background region |
Phenotype Variants
| Variant | Mange Label | BCS Label | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
sham |
M0 | B0 | Healthy negative control |
mange_only |
M2 | B0 | Moderate patchy hair loss with scaling and crusting |
emaciated_only |
M0 | B2 | Visible ribs, noticeable muscle wasting |
severe_both |
M3 | B3 | Severe extensive hair loss + pronounced skeletal landmarks |
Species
| Species | Common Name |
|---|---|
| Urocyon cinereoargenteus | Gray fox |
| Canis lupus | Gray wolf |
| Odocoileus virginianus | White-tailed deer |
| Procyon lotor | Raccoon |
Data Splits
| Split | Size |
|---|---|
| Train | ~497 images (90%) |
| Test | ~56 images (10%) |
Generation Pipeline
Base Image Curation
Base images were drawn from iWildCam 2022 using MegaDetector v4 for animal bounding box detection. Sampling prioritized center-frame animal placement (weight 0.6 center, 0.3 mid-frame, 0.1 edge/corner) and maintained stratified balance across species, season, and day/night conditions.
Phenotype Editing
Synthetic variants were generated using Gemini 3.1 Flash Image. Each edit prompt supplied the model with MegaDetector bounding box coordinates, species identity, severity descriptors, and explicit instructions to edit only the animal region while preserving the background pixel-identical. Lesion placement followed species-specific biology: for canids, sarcoptic mange progression (periocular → ear margins → elbows → flanks); for hoofstock, distribution excludes dorsal midline regions inaccessible to self-grooming.
Quality Control
Every image in this dataset passed scene-drift QC using a decoupled mask-then-score approach:
- Sham pre-filter: The M0/B0 sham variant is generated first; base images where the sham fails QC are excluded entirely (~16% of bases filtered this way).
- Mask construction: Pixel-difference thresholding + connected component labeling identifies changed regions, constrained to overlap the MegaDetector bounding box. Images where the change mask exceeds 70% of frame area are rejected as global re-renders.
- Scene scoring: Computed on Gaussian-blurred background pixels (outside the animal mask):
- Daytime: OR-gate passes if normalized MAE ≤ 7.0 or SSIM ≥ 0.85
- Nighttime/IR: raw MAE ≤ 5.0
Overall QC pass rate: 83% (553 of 666 generated variants). Images failing QC are not included in this release.
Pipeline Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Species represented | 4 |
| Base images processed | 201 |
| Total variants generated | 666 |
| QC-passing variants (this dataset) | 553 (83%) |
| Sham pre-filter rejection rate | 16% |
| Daytime pass rate | 85% |
| Nighttime pass rate | 81% |
Sim-to-Real Transfer Results
A classifier trained exclusively on this synthetic dataset and evaluated on real camera trap images of suspected health conditions achieved:
| Model | AUROC | Balanced Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| MLP (256 hidden units) + DINOv2 ViT-B/14 | 0.854 | 0.811 |
| Linear probe + DINOv2 ViT-B/14 | 0.734 | — |
The real test set (N=70) consisted of 45 healthy iWildCam images held out from the base image pool and 25 community-reported suspected health condition images, controlling for species identity between classes. Suspect labels are community-reported, not clinically confirmed.
Limitations
- Diagnostic ambiguity: Camera trap imagery cannot distinguish mange from lice, seasonal shedding, or idiopathic hair loss.
- Species-condition mismatch: Confirmed mange in white-tailed deer is rare in some regions; the model may flag shedding or mechanical hair loss, requiring per-region calibration.
- Posture confounds: Edits are applied to healthy-posture base images and cannot capture illness-related postural changes.
- Transfer evaluation scale: The real evaluation set is small (N=70); the 0.85 AUROC reflects feasibility, not production-ready performance.
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite:
@inproceedings{brundage2026synthetic,
title = {Generating Synthetic Wildlife Health Data from Camera Trap Imagery: A Pipeline for Alopecia and Body Condition Training Data},
author = {Brundage, David},
}
License
This dataset is released under CC BY 4.0. Base images are derived from iWildCam 2022; please also consult the iWildCam dataset license when using this data.
Contact
David Brundage PhD
University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine
brundage2@wisc.edu
- Downloads last month
- 53